Side by side
ADBHoney vs SNARE
Both stand on honeypot software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Self-hosted
Choose ADBHoney to observe connection, upload, and command activity against exposed ADB endpoints with a focused honeypot. Look elsewhere if the task requires native directory listing, a broad set of shell commands, or interactive shell behavior.
Visit ADBHoney Paid Linux
Visit SNARE The facts
| ADBHoney | SNARE | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted | Linux |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On honeypot software | #17 of 21 | #21 of 21 |
ADBHoney: what it does well
- Accepts ADB connect, push, and shell operations.
- Sends captured data to stdout and saves uploaded files to disk.
- Offers Python-script and Docker deployment routes.
- GPL-3.0 open-source license.
- README characterizes CPU and memory use as fairly low.
What to know first
- Only `adb shell ls` receives a unique shell response.
- Native directory listing and interactive shell are unsupported.
- Requires self-hosted deployment and configuration file placement.
SNARE: what it does well
Alternatives to ADBHoney Alternatives to SNARE The whole list