Side by side
ActiveSLR vs Covidence
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Choose ActiveSLR if you need a web-based systematic review workflow with screening, full-text analysis, and Excel export. Explorer offers immediate access with set limits; teams seeking the unlimited plans must complete identity verification and a licensing agreement.
Visit ActiveSLR Free trial Web
Covidence covers the main stages of systematic review work with screening controls, extraction assistance, and exports. Review teams should check plan scope, import limits, and desktop requirements before purchase.
Visit CovidenceThe facts
| ActiveSLR | Covidence | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Single: $339 a year |
| Plans published | 3 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | activeslr.io | covidence.org |
| On ai literature review software | #25 of 38 | #29 of 38 |
ActiveSLR: what it does well
- Supports systematic review work
- Includes screening workflow and full-text analysis
- Reviews can be exported to Excel
- Explorer is free forever with instant access
- Scholar and Corporate list unlimited citations, reviews, and users
What to know first
- Explorer is limited to 2,000 citations
- Explorer allows two active reviews and three users
- Scholar and Corporate require identity verification and a licensing agreement
Covidence: what it does well
- Structured systematic-review workflow
- Blinded screening and conflict resolution
- Metadata and DOI extraction assistance
- Exports RIS, CSV, XLSX, and XML
- Institutional licensing available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Full-text screening requires desktop
- Imports over 15,000 references need batches
- Institutional pricing not listed
Alternatives to ActiveSLR Alternatives to Covidence The whole list