Side by side
AccessLint vs Stark
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionMac+1
AccessLint combines pull-request feedback with daily monitoring and evidence reports on paid plans. Its checks can identify issues, but they do not block merges or establish compliance.
Visit AccessLint
Free plan WebiPhoneAndroid
Visit Stark The facts
| AccessLint | Stark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Mac, Web | Web, iPhone, Android |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter: $19 a month | Premium Pack: $198 a year |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | accesslint.com | getstark.co |
| On accessibility testing software | #5 of 169 | #9 of 169 |
AccessLint: what it does well
- Free plan includes public-repository pull-request reviews.
- Daily monitoring for one flow on the Free plan.
- Inline comments identify rules and suggest fixes.
- Checks are available for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook.
- Starter and Pro include shareable evidence reports.
What to know first
- Pull-request reviews do not fail builds or block merges.
- Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro.
- Automated checks do not make a site compliant.
- Passing-flow screenshots are deleted after seven days.
Stark: what it does well
Alternatives to AccessLint Alternatives to Stark The whole list