Side by side
AccessiCompliance vs CWAC
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
AccessiCompliance combines automated accessibility checks with documentation and monitoring features. It can organize evidence and follow-up, but full WCAG coverage still requires manual testing and code changes elsewhere.
Visit AccessiCompliance Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
CWAC provides configurable, extensible website accessibility scans without a commercial price. Plan for Docker and Linux deployment to avoid documented audit limitations.
Visit CWACThe facts
| AccessiCompliance | CWAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter Plan: $49 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 9 | 1 |
| Maker | AccessiCompliance | Not published |
| Website | accessicompliance.com | github.com |
| On website accessibility tools | #63 of 133 | #67 of 133 |
AccessiCompliance: what it does well
- Free plan with three monthly scans
- Reports export to PDF, CSV, and JSON
- Daily or weekly monitoring
- 14-day paid-plan trial
- Compliance Vault on higher plans
What to know first
- Automated scans catch only about 30–40% of issues
- Manual testing still needed
- Does not fix website code
- Free plan limited to three scans monthly
CWAC: what it does well
- Free GPL-3.0 open-source license
- Scans many websites and saves CSV findings
- Supports WCAG 2.2 Level AA monitoring
- Plugins can extend audit coverage
- Crawling respects robots.txt and server signals
What to know first
- Some audits may fail without Docker
- Non-Linux operating systems can cause failures
- Reflow cannot run on stated macOS Chrome
- Requires JSON and CSV configuration files
Alternatives to AccessiCompliance Alternatives to CWAC The whole list