Side by side
3DMark vs fio
Both stand on pc stress testing tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidiPhoneMac+1
3DMark combines broad hardware coverage with configurable tests, comparison tools, monitoring, and game frame-rate estimates. Its free edition offers selected personal-use tests, while the full Windows suite is provided through the Advanced Edition.
Visit 3DMark Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
fio offers detailed workload controls, verification, and several output formats at no cost. Its HTTP direct-I/O depth limit matters for users planning those workloads.
Visit fioThe facts
| 3DMark | fio | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | fio |
| Website | benchmarks.ul.com | github.com |
| On pc stress testing tools | #1 of 38 | #2 of 38 |
3DMark: what it does well
- Free Basic Edition available
- Covers PC, Mac, tablets, and smartphones
- Compares matching CPU and GPU systems
- Includes ray-tracing and API tests
- Supports XML export and CLI automation
What to know first
- Storage benchmark requires separate DLC
- Some comparisons are limited to supported platforms
fio: what it does well
- Defines multi-threaded workloads in job files.
- Supports sequential, random, and mixed reads and writes.
- Exports results in text, JSON, and log formats.
- Includes options to verify written data.
- Available for Linux, Windows, macOS, and other systems.
What to know first
- HTTP direct I/O is limited to depth 1.
- Bug reports go to the mailing list or GitHub.