Enrich

Overview

Enrich brings contact discovery and enrichment together for go-to-market teams, developers, and AI-assisted workflows. It is strongest for organizations that need to search, validate, and process prospect data at scale; its monthly credit reset makes choosing the right quota important.

Key features

Lead Finder searches more than 300 million professional contacts and offers over 100 filters. That breadth and filtering depth suit teams building targeted prospect lists, though the useful scale depends on having enough credits to enrich the contacts they select.

Workbench adds live enrichment columns to a spreadsheet and allows unlimited rows on every paid plan. It can fit teams that prefer working through tabular lists, but unlimited rows do not mean unlimited paid lookups: successful results consume credits, and unused credits do not carry into the next billing cycle. Failed lookups do not consume credits, which avoids charging for unsuccessful results.

For developers, the API supports asynchronous bulk operations of up to 500,000 items. Enrich also lists webhooks, TypeScript support, API documentation, an average response time under 200 ms, and official TypeScript/JavaScript and Go client libraries. Those tools make it a plausible fit for automated enrichment pipelines, but the plan’s request and enrichment rates still constrain how quickly work can run.

The MCP server connects Enrich tools to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, and VS Code. It uses OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and automatically managed tokens, making it relevant to teams incorporating contact data into AI workflows. Enrich identifies itself as SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and CCPA compliant. The company says critical issues receive a one-hour response time and provides support at [email protected].

Pricing

The free plan costs nothing and gives new accounts 100 credits, with every product unlocked and no credit card required. It is useful for a small initial allocation, but it does not provide the recurring monthly volume of a paid plan.

Growth costs $49 a month, billed monthly, for 100,000 credits per month, unlimited seats, 25 req/s burst, 300 req/min sustained, and 100 enrichments/min. It is the entry paid option for teams with regular use that can stay within its throughput limits. Scale costs $149 a month, billed monthly, and raises the monthly allowance to 500,000 credits, with unlimited seats, 50 req/s burst, 1,000 req/min sustained, and 500 enrichments/min. That higher ceiling is better suited to heavier workloads.

Pro costs $499 a month, billed monthly, and includes 2,500,000 credits per month, unlimited seats, 100 req/s burst, 5,000 req/min sustained, and 2,000 enrichments/min. It is the clearest fit for high-volume teams that need more throughput as well as credits. Enterprise has custom pricing, custom credit volumes, higher rate limits, dedicated support and SLA, SSO, and a custom security review; it suits organizations whose volume or security requirements exceed the standard tiers.

Across paid plans, unused credits expire at the end of the billing cycle. That makes accurate volume forecasting material: teams with uneven monthly demand may lose value when usage falls short of their allowance.

Platforms

Enrich is available through a web interface and API. Its MCP server extends the workflow to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, and VS Code.

Who it's for

Enrich is a sensible choice for GTM teams that need filtered contact search and recurring enrichment, or developers who need bulk API operations, client libraries, and webhooks. Teams that value spreadsheet-based processing can use Workbench on any paid plan. It is less compelling for occasional or unpredictable use if monthly credits are likely to expire unused.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Search spans more than 300 million professional contacts, with over 100 filters for narrowing prospect lists.
• Pros: Bulk API operations can process up to 500,000 items, backed by developer libraries, webhooks, and published throughput limits.
• Pros: Unlimited seats on all three paid tiers let teams share a plan without a per-seat cap.
• Cons: Unused credits do not roll over, so variable demand can leave paid allowances wasted.
• Cons: Growth starts at 100 enrichments/min, while higher throughput requires a more expensive tier.
• Cons: The free plan is limited to 100 credits for new accounts, so sustained use requires a paid plan.

Alternatives

For candidate sourcing, compare Candidate Sourcing Software; for contact-data workflows, browse Lead Enrichment Software.

Avery is a better fit when the priority is searching vetted European profiles and ranked matches with explanations rather than outreach or contact details. ContactOut is worth considering for teams seeking browser-extension access alongside API access and a bulk license covering 700M+ profiles; its free plan includes 10 credits.

Coresignal offers an alternative API and web workflow, with a free tier that includes 2,000 credits, 5 req/s, and a 7-day trial. Findem may suit teams interested in trying an expert-built agent through Findem Studio at no cost.

Hyranse is an alternative for teams that want a free allowance combining five monthly contact credits and two AI searches, though its free plan has no API or MCP. Jobin.cloud may be a better match for users who want a free plan with 30 enrichment credits, up to 50K contacts, and limited outreach automation.

Nebula offers 100 free verified contact lookups per organization alongside AI candidate matching and outreach. Pin is another option, with a free tier that includes five contact lookup credits per week and one job position.

Verdict

Choose Enrich if your team needs contact discovery and enrichment across search, spreadsheets, API, or AI tools, and can use its monthly credit allowance consistently. Its combination of broad search, bulk processing, and unlimited paid-plan seats is the main draw. Look elsewhere if your usage is sporadic or you need credits to roll over rather than expire each billing cycle.