EasyRisk

Overview

EasyRisk is an operational risk register for teams that need to assess, treat, and monitor risks in one workspace. It suits organizations seeking structured risk scoring and accountable follow-up, from a single editor to multi-team deployments. Its strongest case is the combination of review monitoring and an in-app change history users cannot alter; it is not a substitute for ISO certification.

Key features

EasyRisk uses a qualitative 5×5 matrix to show inherent and residual risk, with computed severity bands. That gives teams a consistent way to compare exposure before and after treatment. Organizations that need a scoring model tailored to their own framework will need Enterprise, which includes custom scoring frameworks.

Risk owners and roles, treatment actions and due dates, comment threads, and next-review dates connect assessment to follow-up. Dashboards surface overdue reviews and high-severity risks, useful for teams that need to keep a register active rather than let it become a periodic reporting exercise.

Changes to risks and treatments capture who made them, when, and the old and new values. Application users cannot edit or delete these entries, which supports traceability. EasyRisk describes its workflow as aligned with ISO 31000, but explicitly says it is not certified to that standard.

The pricing comparison includes a REST API and MCP server for AI assistants. Enterprise adds SAML and OIDC single sign-on with MS Entra ID, Okta, and Google Workspace. The Trust Center says workspace isolation is enforced with database Row-Level Security and tested automatically before each release. Data and backups stay within the EU/EEA and Switzerland; daily database backups are retained as the latest 30 runs in encrypted form. Organizations requiring ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 report, or penetration-test reports should confirm directly whether EasyRisk can meet that requirement.

Pricing

EasyRisk has a free plan and paid tiers. The pricing note gives paid pricing from €14/user/mo (annual), while the plan comparison quotes prices in USD:

• Free: free, forever. It includes unlimited risks, one risk board, one editor, one attachment per risk, and standard email support. This is a useful way for an individual to maintain a register, but the single board and editor constrain shared use.
• Team: $168 a year, or $14.00 per editor per month billed annually. It provides five risk boards, unlimited editors, five attachments per risk, and priority support. It fits teams that need multiple contributors without the broader reporting and configuration tools of Business.
• Business: $29 a year, billed per editor per month and billed yearly. It includes ten boards, 25 attachments per risk, custom risk categories and scales, quarterly PDF reports, an AI risk copilot, REST API, TOTP, time-boxed access delegation, and priority support. Those additions make it the more capable option for multi-team organizations and board reporting. The listed annual amount differs from the monthly-equivalent figure for Team, so compare the plan terms directly before choosing.
• Enterprise: custom pricing tailored to the organization. It includes unlimited boards, editors, viewers, and attachments; SAML/OIDC SSO; SCIM provisioning; a dedicated tenant and EU/CH data residency; custom scoring frameworks; a dedicated customer success manager; and onboarding and training. It is aimed at regulated organizations with formal second- and third-line defenses.

There is no free trial. Free includes standard email support, while Team and Business include priority support; Enterprise adds dedicated customer success. EasyRisk can also run on an organization's own infrastructure or servers, giving organizations a self-hosting option.

Platforms

EasyRisk supports web access, an API, and self-hosting. Its hybrid deployment options suit organizations choosing between a hosted workspace and running the software on their own infrastructure.

Who it's for

EasyRisk is a good fit for teams that want comparable risk scores, visible review deadlines, and a traceable treatment history. Business is positioned for multi-team work and board reporting; Enterprise is the stronger fit for regulated organizations needing formal defense lines, expanded access controls, and custom scoring. It is less suitable for buyers who require a particular assurance report or certification without first confirming that EasyRisk can provide it.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Inherent and residual scoring, review dates, and dashboard alerts bring assessment and follow-up together.
• Pros: Risk and treatment changes retain actor, time, and before-and-after values, and users cannot edit or delete the entries in the app.
• Pros: Self-hosting, EU/EEA and Switzerland data and backup residency, and daily encrypted backups offer deployment and data-location options.
• Cons: The default matrix is qualitative; custom scoring frameworks are reserved for Enterprise.
• Cons: Free is limited to one editor and one board, while even Team permits only five attachments per risk.
• Cons: ISO 31000 alignment is not certification, and organizations needing ISO 27001, SOC 2, or penetration-test assurance must confirm whether their requirements can be met.

Alternatives

Consider Pirani if mobile access matters: it supports Android and iOS and offers a free tier with 200 records, five seats, one heat map report, and 2.5 GB of cloud storage. Eramba is worth comparing when an open, self-hosted community edition is the priority; its listed Enterprise On-Premise plan starts at €2,500 a year. Riskware may suit buyers seeking a paid option with a free trial and mobile apps.

Qualsys EQMS is another paid option with Android, iOS, and web platforms. For buyers considering broader risk and compliance offerings, Ncontracts uses contact-based pricing, while Protecht charges annual license fees based on named active users and prices some modules and templates extra. Quantivate Business Continuity Software is a paid alternative with contact-based pricing and a demo request. Riskonnect is another paid option whose pricing depends on project size, complexity, and customization. Browse Risk Management Software for more options.

Verdict

Choose EasyRisk if your organization wants a structured operational risk register with visible review follow-up and an application-protected audit history, and its qualitative matrix fits your process. Look elsewhere if a particular certification or assurance report is mandatory, or if your scoring model cannot fit the standard matrix and Enterprise custom frameworks are not practical.