Side by side
Uptime Kuma vs UptimeKeeper
Both stand on website monitoring software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWeb+1
Uptime Kuma provides broad self-hosted monitoring, alerting and status-page features under an MIT license. Check the supported operating systems and storage limitations before choosing a deployment.
Visit Uptime Kuma Free plan APIWeb
UptimeKeeper combines availability, performance, certificate, content, alerting, status-page, and API tools. The free plan offers essential monitoring, while teams needing advanced checks or SMS should consider the paid tiers.
Visit UptimeKeeperThe facts
| Uptime Kuma | UptimeKeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Individual: $7 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | uptimekeeper.com |
| On website monitoring software | #19 of 55 | #29 of 55 |
Uptime Kuma: what it does well
- Monitors services, DNS, Docker containers and more.
- Supports more than 90 notification services.
- Multiple status pages can map to specific domains.
- Installation instructions cover Docker and non-Docker setups.
- Includes two-factor authentication.
What to know first
- Network file systems such as NFS are unsupported.
- FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Replit and Heroku are unsupported.
- General or technical support by email is unavailable.
UptimeKeeper: what it does well
- Monitors websites, APIs, and ports globally
- Checks SSL, domains, latency, and page speed
- Email and SMS downtime alerts
- Branded status pages can be embedded
- API access supports automation
What to know first
- Advanced SSL and domain monitoring are paid
- SMS alerts are paid features
- Paid plans start at 7.00 USD monthly
Alternatives to Uptime Kuma Alternatives to UptimeKeeper The whole list