Side by side
Trilio Site Recovery vs Vinchin Backup & Recovery
Both stand on container backup software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted
Choose Trilio Site Recovery if your team runs KubeVirt or OpenShift Virtualization VMs and needs replication, failover orchestration, and isolated recovery testing. Its Technology Preview availability and pricing on request are key considerations for teams evaluating access and cost.
Visit Trilio Site Recovery Free plan LinuxWindows
Visit Vinchin Backup & Recovery The facts
| Trilio Site Recovery | Vinchin Backup & Recovery | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Vinchin Backup & Recovery |
| Website | trilio.io | vinchin.com |
| On container backup software | #29 of 34 | #14 of 34 |
Trilio Site Recovery: what it does well
- Continuous replication supports synchronous and asynchronous modes.
- Automated failover can coordinate VM startup, network reassignment, and DNS cutover.
- Isolated recovery tests use replicated snapshots without disrupting production.
- Policies can be stored as Git-managed Kubernetes custom resources.
- Uses no VM agent and supports a centralized control plane for multiple clusters.
What to know first
- Availability is through the Technology Preview Early Adopter Program.
- Support is listed for Red Hat OpenShift 4.20 and later.
- Pricing is available on request.
Vinchin Backup & Recovery: what it does well
Alternatives to Trilio Site Recovery Alternatives to Vinchin Backup & Recovery The whole list