Side by side
Staticcheck vs Stylelint
Both stand on linters. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Pick Staticcheck if you need a no-cost Go analyzer covering bugs, performance, simplification, style, and quick fixes. Its editor, command-line, and CI paths make it adaptable, with configuration available in TOML. Look elsewhere if you need a linter for languages other than Go or support outside its listed platforms.
Visit Staticcheck
Stylelint provides flexible CSS linting through its CLI, Node.js API and PostCSS integration. Its free offering includes extensive rules and extension options, with general support directed to Stack Overflow and issue reports to GitHub.
Visit StylelintThe facts
| Staticcheck | Stylelint | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | staticcheck.dev | stylelint.io |
| On linters | #28 of 33 | #24 of 33 |
Staticcheck: what it does well
- Free and open-source
- More than 150 Go checks
- Designed to limit false positives
- Editor integration with automatic fixes
- GitHub Actions support for CI
What to know first
- Supports only Go projects
- Each release supports two recent Go versions
- Package-manager releases may lag behind
- Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows only
Stylelint: what it does well
- More than 100 built-in rules for modern CSS
- Can automatically fix problems when possible
- Supports custom rules and reusable configurations
- Offers CLI, Node.js API and PostCSS integration
- Free, with no paid plans or usage limits stated
What to know first
- Custom syntax support for other languages requires extensions
- Maintained by volunteers
Alternatives to Staticcheck Alternatives to Stylelint The whole list