FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

StackEdit vs Turtl

Both stand on note-taking apps. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

StackEdit

Free plan Open source Web

StackEdit combines browser-based Markdown editing with offline access, collaboration, sync, and publishing workflows. It is listed as free and open source, with support for several Markdown variants and export formats.

Visit StackEdit

Turtl

Free plan Open source AndroidAPIExtension+4

Turtl combines collaborative Spaces, note organization, and on-device encryption, with self-hosting and profile export as additional options. Consider its invitation-security warning and stated HIPAA limitations when deciding whether it fits sensitive workflows.

Visit Turtl

The facts

StackEditTurtl
Free planYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
Runs onWebAndroid, API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestPremium: $3 a month
Plans published14
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitestackedit.ioturtlapp.com
On note-taking apps#3 of 216#1 of 216

StackEdit: what it does well

  • Works offline and supports local files.
  • Merges simultaneous edits by collaborators.
  • Syncs with Google Drive, Dropbox, and GitHub.
  • Exports Markdown, HTML, and PDF.

What to know first

  • The product is described as an in-browser editor.
  • Copyright information displayed covers 2013–2019.
  • Its Markdown flavor is listed as custom.

Turtl: what it does well

  • Supports five note types
  • Spaces offer permissions from read-only to full ownership
  • Works offline
  • Full-profile import and export
  • Open-source server can be self-hosted

What to know first

  • Basic storage is 50MB
  • Basic allows three collaborators per Space
  • Email invitations can expose a Space if intercepted
  • Turtl says it likely is not HIPAA compliant

Alternatives to StackEdit Alternatives to Turtl The whole list