Side by side
SRT Live Server vs StreamHouse
Both stand on live tv streaming services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted
SRT Live Server supplies a self-hosted SRT pipeline for publishing, playback, relaying, monitoring, and optional recording. Its MPEG-TS focus and required SRT dependency are important implementation constraints.
Visit SRT Live Server
Free plan AndroidWeb
StreamHouse combines uploaded-video automation, live-queue control, scheduling, and multi-destination output. Choose a plan based on simultaneous streams, storage, and required video quality, and prepare editing elsewhere.
Visit StreamHouseThe facts
| SRT Live Server | StreamHouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted | Android, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Starter: $19 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | StreamHouse |
| Website | github.com | streamhouse.co |
| On live tv streaming services | #60 of 169 | #56 of 169 |
SRT Live Server: what it does well
- Free MIT-licensed open-source software
- Supports FFmpeg, OBS, and ffplay workflows
- Provides pull and push relay modes
- Offers Docker deployment guidance
- Can post statistics and connection events
What to know first
- Supports MPEG-TS streaming only
- SRT must be installed before building
- HLS recording is disabled by default
- MIT license provides no warranty
StreamHouse: what it does well
- Cloud playback supports looping playlists
- Streams can reach multiple destinations
- Custom RTMP, RTMPS, and SRT outputs
- Role-based team permissions
- Free plan available
What to know first
- No browser studio is included
- No video editor is included
- Free plan details are limited
- Higher plans are needed for more simultaneous streams
Alternatives to SRT Live Server Alternatives to StreamHouse The whole list