FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Sleipnir vs SRT Live Server

Both stand on live tv streaming services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Sleipnir

Free plan Web

Sleipnir combines multistream relay, custom RTMP, overlays, and team features in a web service. The free tier has clear limits, while paid plans raise destination and overlay allowances.

Visit Sleipnir

SRT Live Server

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted

SRT Live Server supplies a self-hosted SRT pipeline for publishing, playback, relaying, monitoring, and optional recording. Its MPEG-TS focus and required SRT dependency are important implementation constraints.

Visit SRT Live Server

The facts

SleipnirSRT Live Server
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWebLinux, Mac, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planStandard: $5 a monthFree or on request
Plans published31
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitesleipnir.tvgithub.com
On live tv streaming services#64 of 169#60 of 169

Sleipnir: what it does well

  • Relays one upload to multiple destinations
  • Supports Twitch, Kick, YouTube, and custom RTMP
  • Passes video through without perceptible delay
  • Free plan includes three destinations
  • Animated overlays can include chat and alerts

What to know first

  • Maximum video quality is 1080p
  • Free plan allows one overlay generation monthly
  • No stream recording
  • Relay stops at the plan cap

SRT Live Server: what it does well

  • Free MIT-licensed open-source software
  • Supports FFmpeg, OBS, and ffplay workflows
  • Provides pull and push relay modes
  • Offers Docker deployment guidance
  • Can post statistics and connection events

What to know first

  • Supports MPEG-TS streaming only
  • SRT must be installed before building
  • HLS recording is disabled by default
  • MIT license provides no warranty

Alternatives to Sleipnir Alternatives to SRT Live Server The whole list