Side by side
SCYTHE vs Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET)
Both stand on offensive security. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial LinuxSelf-hostedWeb+1
Choose SCYTHE if your security team needs continuous adversary emulation, ATT&CK-mapped results, and deployment options that include air-gapped environments. Organizations seeking a free plan or a published fixed price should look elsewhere; campaign execution also requires human approval when AI generates the plan.
Visit SCYTHE Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) The facts
| SCYTHE | Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | scythe.io | github.com |
| On offensive security | #12 of 22 | #16 of 22 |
SCYTHE: what it does well
- Maps control outcomes to MITRE ATT&CK coverage and gaps.
- Runs scheduled, continuous adversary campaigns.
- AI creates campaign plans from plain-language threat descriptions.
- Supports air-gapped, cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployment.
- Integrates bidirectionally with SIEM, EDR, and ticketing systems.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Pricing is custom-quoted based on environment scope.
- AI-generated campaign execution requires human approval.
Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET): what it does well
Alternatives to SCYTHE Alternatives to Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) The whole list