Side by side
SafeShare vs SendFile
Both stand on file transfer services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
SafeShare offers self-hosted sharing with granular upload controls, privacy modes, encryption options, and administration features. Review its encryption memory warning, unsupported metadata formats, and Fortress-mode limitations before deployment.
Visit SafeShare Paid Self-hostedWeb
SendFile provides straightforward encrypted uploads, sharing, and deletion links, with a self-hosting option through Lufi. Users should consider the retained IP addresses and visible file metadata before using an instance.
Visit SendFileThe facts
| SafeShare | SendFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | sendfile.igretec.com |
| On file transfer services | #101 of 105 | #105 of 105 |
SafeShare: what it does well
- No required user accounts
- Automatic expiration and download limits
- Optional browser end-to-end encryption
- Docker and Linux deployment options
- API, webhooks, and Prometheus monitoring
What to know first
- Browser encryption warns about files over 500 MB
- Losing the storage key prevents recovery
- Metadata stripping excludes several formats
- Fortress mode lacks planned PostgreSQL, S3, and malware scanning
SendFile: what it does well
- Free and open source
- No registration required for uploads
- Files encrypted before sending
- Download and deletion links
- Self-hosting under AGPLv3
What to know first
- Administrator can see file metadata
- IP addresses stored for legal reasons
- Official About page unavailable
- Listed instance tag is 0.05.21
Alternatives to SafeShare Alternatives to SendFile The whole list