FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Sōzu vs Soli Proxy

Both stand on reverse proxy software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Sōzu

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Sōzu focuses on dynamic proxy operation, runtime updates, backend balancing, and upgrade continuity. Its self-hosted Linux deployment and AGPL licensing are important considerations before adoption.

Visit Sōzu

Soli Proxy

Free plan APILinuxMac+1

Soli Proxy offers a configurable self-hosted proxy with deployment, resilience, scripting, and observability features. Plan to implement rate limiting through Lua and secure the Admin API appropriately.

Visit Soli Proxy

The facts

SōzuSoli Proxy
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitesozu.ioproxy.solisoft.net
On reverse proxy software#27 of 33#23 of 33

Sōzu: what it does well

  • Runtime configuration changes without reloads
  • Multiple backend load-balancing algorithms
  • TLS termination with three compile-time backends
  • Logs support files, sockets, TCP, and UDP
  • Linux binaries and Docker images available

What to know first

  • Self-hosted deployment requires operational management
  • GNU Affero GPL obligations apply to covered businesses
  • Fixed resource and connection limits are part of design

Soli Proxy: what it does well

  • Free plan with self-hosted deployment
  • HTTP/2 and WebSocket support
  • Blue-green updates with health checks
  • Lua scripting and hot-reload routing
  • Prometheus metrics and REST administration

What to know first

  • No built-in rate limiter
  • Unauthenticated Admin API must use loopback
  • Requires self-hosted deployment
  • Rate limiting requires Lua scripting

Alternatives to Sōzu Alternatives to Soli Proxy The whole list