Side by side
Roadiz vs WebsiteBaker
Both stand on content management systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Roadiz combines structured, multilingual editing with headless and conventional website delivery. Its self-hosted setup and required configuration make it better suited to teams comfortable managing a Symfony application.
Visit Roadiz Free plan Self-hostedWebWindows
WebsiteBaker combines core publishing, access control, multilingual tools, and extensibility in a self-hosted CMS. It is a practical fit when you can provide PHP-based hosting and manage the installation yourself.
Visit WebsiteBakerThe facts
| Roadiz | WebsiteBaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | WebsiteBaker |
| Website | docs.roadiz.io | websitebaker.org |
| On content management systems | #46 of 165 | #50 of 165 |
Roadiz: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Headless or Twig website support
- Custom content types and multilingual editing
- Media library with external storage
- Granular roles and permissions
What to know first
- Not production-ready out of the box
- Requires PHP 8.3 or later
- DeepL is the only built-in translation provider
WebsiteBaker: what it does well
- Free for private and commercial use
- Multilingual content and administration
- Group-based access privileges
- Templates use PHP, HTML, CSS, and jQuery
- Supports add-ons and custom modules
What to know first
- Requires self-hosting with PHP and a database
- Windows Portable Edition is separate
- GPL terms apply
Alternatives to Roadiz Alternatives to WebsiteBaker The whole list