Side by side
Riemann vs Splunk IT Service Intelligence
Both stand on alert management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Riemann offers event collection, stream processing, dashboards, and alert integrations for distributed systems monitoring. Teams should account for its manual sharding requirement and use TCP when reliable event delivery and acknowledgement matter.
Visit Riemann Paid Web
Visit Splunk IT Service Intelligence The facts
| Riemann | Splunk IT Service Intelligence | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | riemann.io | splunk.com |
| On alert management software | #31 of 36 | #35 of 36 |
Riemann: what it does well
- Processes configurable event streams in Clojure
- Dashboard can display matching events live
- Supports email and PagerDuty alerts
- Integrates with Graphite and Librato Metrics
- Open source and free
What to know first
- UDP can lose events
- Workloads do not shard automatically
- Configuration is written in Clojure
Splunk IT Service Intelligence: what it does well
Alternatives to Riemann Alternatives to Splunk IT Service Intelligence The whole list