Side by side
Repsy vs Satis
Both stand on artifact repository software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
Repsy combines broad package-format support with repository controls, proxy caching, and pipeline integration. The free tier includes 20 GB per user, but API integration is not yet available and Maven health checks are premium-only.
Visit Repsy Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Satis provides a focused way to generate and host a private Composer repository. Its source options, authentication controls, automation, and archive features cover common private-package workflows, provided your PHP environment is supported.
Visit SatisThe facts
| Repsy | Satis | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | repsy.io | composer.github.io |
| On artifact repository software | #52 of 64 | #48 of 64 |
Repsy: what it does well
- Supports nine listed package formats
- Unlimited public or private repositories
- Docker and Maven proxy caching
- 20 GB free storage per user
- Web and self-hosted deployment
What to know first
- API integration is marked coming soon
- Maven health checks require premium
- Enterprise storage details reach 5 TB
Satis: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports VCS and Composer sources
- Cron and webhook rebuild options
- SSH, HTTPS, and token authentication
- ZIP and TAR archive generation
What to know first
- Requires a recent supported PHP version
- Selective updates may scan all VCS repositories
- Mirrored non-platform code may lack downloads