FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

React Static vs Static Site Boilerplate

Both stand on static site generators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

React Static

Free plan Self-hostedWeb

React Static combines static HTML output with a code-split React experience and a wide plugin ecosystem. Its maintenance-only status and lack of future major versions should factor into adoption decisions.

Visit React Static

Static Site Boilerplate

Free plan Web

Static Site Boilerplate brings development, build, and deployment tasks together for static sites. Its free, MIT-licensed code includes several optional setup libraries and stated browser targets.

Visit Static Site Boilerplate

The facts

React StaticStatic Site Boilerplate
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onSelf-hosted, WebWeb
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comstaticsiteboilerplate.com
On static site generators#27 of 35#31 of 35

React Static: what it does well

  • Exports routes as HTML for static file servers.
  • Supports CMS integration and a local preview server.
  • Official plugins cover a broad set of tools and formats.
  • MIT-licensed and free to use.

What to know first

  • The project is in maintenance-only mode.
  • No new major versions are planned.

Static Site Boilerplate: what it does well

  • Local development server includes hot reloading.
  • Builds optimize images and minify CSS and JavaScript.
  • Creates favicons for web, Apple, and Android.
  • Deployment support includes FTP and Netlify.
  • MIT-licensed code.

What to know first

  • The listed platform is web.
  • No paid plan is listed.

Alternatives to React Static Alternatives to Static Site Boilerplate The whole list