Side by side
Rakh vs Shofer
Both stand on ai coding assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Rakh combines local codebase work with provider choice, Git worktrees, MCP connections, and approval gates. Its free open-source model and cross-platform desktop packages suit users who want control over agent actions.
Visit Rakh Free plan Extension
Shofer combines visual workflow analysis with a local coding agent and configurable model providers. Its VS Code focus and Linux-only kernel sandbox limit where it fits, but the open-source plan keeps software costs at no cost when using local models.
Visit ShoferThe facts
| Rakh | Shofer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Extension |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | rakh.sh | shofer.dev |
| On ai coding assistants | #70 of 102 | #74 of 102 |
Rakh: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows
- Separate tabs isolate agent state
- Approval gates cover edits and commands
- Built-in planning and review subagents
What to know first
- A model provider must be configured
- Users must approve requested actions
- Requires choosing a project folder and model
Shofer: what it does well
- Open-source Apache 2.0 plan
- Visual workflow diagrams and runtime logs
- Persistent local codebase memory
- Bring-your-own model providers
- Per-session USD budget controls
What to know first
- Supports Visual Studio Code only
- Kernel-level worktree sandboxing is Linux-only
- Users pay for their own API tokens