FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Rake vs Shake

Both stand on build automation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Rake

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Choose Rake if you want a free, Ruby-based way to define tasks, prerequisites, and file handling, with packaged tasks and parallel execution. It suits Ruby environments on Linux, macOS, and Windows; it requires Ruby 2.0.0 or later.

Visit Rake

Shake

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Shake offers flexible dependency rules, build progress estimates, and profiling for developers building or maintaining build systems. Its Haskell requirement and lack of default rules are important to account for when adopting it.

Visit Shake

The facts

RakeShake
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteruby.github.ioshakebuild.com
On build automation software#24 of 42#28 of 42

Rake: what it does well

  • Rakefiles use standard Ruby syntax.
  • Tasks can declare prerequisite tasks.
  • Rule patterns can synthesize implicit tasks.
  • FileLists support manipulating names and paths.
  • Includes tarball tasks and parallel execution.

What to know first

  • Requires Ruby 2.0.0 or later.
  • Installation requires the `gem install rake` command.
  • The project provides the software without express or implied warranties.

Shake: what it does well

  • Rules can discover dependencies dynamically.
  • Supports parallel builds and resource constraints.
  • Profiling reports show what built and why.
  • Can execute Ninja files for CMake and Meson integration.
  • Open source under the BSD license.

What to know first

  • Build systems must be written in Haskell.
  • Shake does not provide default build rules.
  • Haskell Stack may need to be installed first.

Alternatives to Rake Alternatives to Shake The whole list