Side by side

Quokka vs Tungstenic

Both stand on mobile application security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Quokka

Paid AndroidAPIiPhone+1

Quokka offers distinct tools for app testing, mobile app vetting, and Android firmware analysis, with integrations for development and MDM workflows. Pricing is not published, though a 30-day trial and free app report are offered.

Visit Quokka

Tungstenic

Paid Web

Choose Tungstenic if your team needs mobile app security analysis with exploit verification, evidence-rich reporting, and remediation tracking. Look elsewhere if you need a publicly stated price or a platform beyond the web offering.

Visit Tungstenic

The facts

	Quokka	Tungstenic
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Android, API, iPhone, Web	Web
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Not published
Plans published	3	None
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	quokka.io	tungstenic.com
On mobile application security testing software	#15 of 21	#19 of 21

Quokka: what it does well

Q-mast analyzes app binaries without source code.
Q-scout operates off-device without agents or user disruption.
Q-firm analyzes Android firmware applications.
A free app security report is offered.

What to know first

Product pricing is available only on request.
Q-firm focuses on Android firmware and system apps.
The 30-day trial is listed, but no free plan is stated.

Tungstenic: what it does well

Analyzes both Android and iOS app binaries.
Combines static, dynamic, and AI-assisted analysis.
Verifies vulnerabilities through real exploitation.
Provides technical and executive reports with screenshot and video evidence.
Supports pentester-led or automated CI/CD workflows.

What to know first

Access is by request or demo.
Pricing is available on request.
The listed platform is web.

Alternatives to Quokka Alternatives to Tungstenic The whole list