Side by side
QuizLive vs Tweedback
Both stand on audience response systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
QuizLive provides account-free, browser-based interactive sessions with self-hosting and offline operation. Its capacity and licensing limits matter for larger or commercial events, which may need paid Firebase service and a different arrangement.
Visit QuizLive
Free plan Web
Tweedback provides polls, chat, questions, and feedback without requiring participant accounts or apps. Its free option and privacy claims are useful starting points, while plan limits and paid pricing need checking.
Visit TweedbackThe facts
| QuizLive | Tweedback | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | tweedback.de |
| On audience response systems | #80 of 118 | #84 of 118 |
QuizLive: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Players join without accounts
- Works on local networks offline
- CSV leaderboard downloads
- Live quiz, polling and Q&A modes
What to know first
- Commercial use is disallowed
- Free Firebase tier supports about 80–100 players
- No rate limit on player joins
- Only one setup is tested end-to-end
Tweedback: what it does well
- Participants join without registration or downloads
- Anonymous polls and questions are supported
- Questions can be weighted by attendee likes
- Website embedding uses an adjustable HTML iFrame
- Free audience interaction is available
What to know first
- AWARD is still in development
- The free plan’s limits are unspecified
Alternatives to QuizLive Alternatives to Tweedback The whole list