FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Quine vs TuGraph

Both stand on graph databases. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Quine

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Quine combines streaming graph processing with continuously evaluated queries and a broad set of documented inputs and outputs. Its best-effort delivery limit matters when missed results would be consequential.

Visit Quine

TuGraph

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

TuGraph combines graph storage, queries, analytics, and visualization, with different deployment scales listed for its editions. The Community Edition is free; organizations needing a distributed PB-scale architecture should consult about Enterprise Edition.

Visit TuGraph

The facts

QuineTuGraph
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published22
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitequine.iotugraph.tech
On graph databases#16 of 39#20 of 39

Quine: what it does well

  • Open-source edition costs nothing
  • Accepts a range of documented streaming inputs
  • Routes results to messaging, webhooks and files
  • Supports Cypher and Gremlin
  • Enterprise adds clustering and high availability

What to know first

  • Graph size is limited by storage capacity
  • Executable requires Java JRE 11 or newer
  • Standing-query outputs are best effort

TuGraph: what it does well

  • Supports real-time queries and offline analytics.
  • Documents serializable ACID transactions.
  • Includes graph algorithms and multiple index types.
  • Free Community Edition supports TB-scale data.
  • Packages listed for CentOS and Ubuntu.

What to know first

  • Enterprise Edition pricing requires consultation.
  • Community Edition is described as centralized deployment.
  • Enterprise support is a paid edition feature.

Alternatives to Quine Alternatives to TuGraph The whole list