Side by side
Quicklisp vs Shards
Both stand on package managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Quicklisp centralizes Common Lisp library installation and dependency loading across many implementations. Its proxy limits and as-is warranty are important operational details.
Visit Quicklisp Free plan AndroidLinuxMac+1
Shards provides Crystal projects with configuration-based dependency fetching and lockfile-backed repeatability. Its distributed design fits repository-oriented workflows, while Windows and Android support have the stated limitations.
Visit ShardsThe facts
| Quicklisp | Shards | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Android, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | quicklisp.org | crystal-lang.org |
| On package managers | #51 of 93 | #55 of 93 |
Quicklisp: what it does well
- Catalog of over 1,500 libraries
- Automatic dependency downloads
- Offline installation support
- Search and uninstall commands
- Return to earlier library sets
What to know first
- Proxy authentication is unsupported
- Direct proxy support is plain HTTP only
- Provided as-is without warranty
Shards: what it does well
- Reads dependencies from shard.yml
- Lockfile records versions or Git commits
- Distributed model without a centralized repository
- Provides dependency management commands
- Supports reproducible installs
What to know first
- Windows support is still a preview
- Android packages are community-maintained Termux packages
- No centralized package repository
Alternatives to Quicklisp Alternatives to Shards The whole list