Side by side
QuickCheck vs unittest
Both stand on unit testing frameworks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
QuickCheck provides a focused property-testing toolkit for Haskell, with generators, distribution inspection, and multiple testing styles. Its language scope and compiler compatibility should fit the project before adoption.
Visit QuickCheck
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
unittest provides test organization, command-line execution, discovery, and mock support as part of Python’s standard library. Its discovery requirement for importable files is worth considering when structuring a project.
Visit unittestThe facts
| QuickCheck | unittest | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | docs.python.org |
| On unit testing frameworks | #32 of 32 | #28 of 32 |
QuickCheck: what it does well
- Generates random cases for property checks
- Supports custom data generators
- Provides tools for examining data distributions
- Includes monadic property testing
- Works with GHC and Hugs versions listed
What to know first
- Supports Haskell only
- Requires adding it to package dependencies
- Monadic testing uses a separate module
unittest: what it does well
- Includes fixtures, TestCase, TestSuite, and test runners.
- Supports configurable test discovery.
- Allows skipped tests and expected failures.
- Subtests report parameters when an iteration fails.
- Free to use and distribute commercially.
What to know first
- Discovery requires importable test files.
- The framework supports Python only.
Alternatives to QuickCheck Alternatives to unittest The whole list