FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

psmux vs WMUX

Both stand on terminal multiplexers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

psmux

Free plan Windows

psmux offers a broad set of tmux-style terminal controls and compatibility features for Windows. It is not an option for Linux or macOS, for which the project recommends tmux.

Visit psmux

WMUX

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

WMUX offers persistent terminal sessions and configurable pane layouts across three desktop platforms. Users should account for missing Windows ARM64 builds and the trust prompts that may appear because its v1 binaries are unsigned and not notarized.

Visit WMUX

The facts

psmuxWMUX
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedFree or on request
Plans publishedNone1
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitepsmux.pages.devgithub.com
On terminal multiplexers#24 of 29#20 of 29

psmux: what it does well

  • Free plan available.
  • Supports persistent sessions and five layouts.
  • Reads existing .tmux.conf files.
  • Runs several Windows shells in panes.
  • Offers multiple installation options.

What to know first

  • Built exclusively for Windows.
  • Requires Windows 10 or 11.
  • libtmux guidance notes a Windows encoding caveat.

WMUX: what it does well

  • Keeps terminal workspaces active after client disconnection.
  • Supports horizontal and vertical pane splits and zoom.
  • Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Windows builds do not require POSIX emulation.
  • MIT-licensed and free, with no usage limits stated.

What to know first

  • Windows ARM64 builds are not provided.
  • Package-manager repositories are not currently available.
  • v1 binaries are not Authenticode-signed or Apple-notarized.

Alternatives to psmux Alternatives to WMUX The whole list