Side by side
prosesmasher vs WRITER
Both stand on writing style checkers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
prosesmasher provides configurable, deterministic linting for teams that want rules enforced in automated workflows. It flags issues rather than rewriting prose, so editorial review remains necessary.
Visit prosesmasher
Free trial APIExtensionMac+2
Choose WRITER if your work combines long-form writing with SEO, collaboration or brand voice controls. Teams needing unlimited users and connectors, departmental voice profiles or advanced governance should consider Enterprise; Starter has defined user, connector and storage limits.
Visit WRITERThe facts
| prosesmasher | WRITER | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | No |
| Runs on | Not published | API, Extension, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Starter: $39 per user a month |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | WRITER |
| Website | github.com | writer.com |
| On writing style checkers | #28 of 29 | #24 of 29 |
prosesmasher: what it does well
- Free and MIT licensed
- No LLM required
- Five shipped language presets
- Editable JSON configuration
- Text and JSON output
What to know first
- English has strongest support
- Other-language heuristics are partial
- Does not rewrite or fact-check text
- Opinionated checks can produce false positives
WRITER: what it does well
- Includes long-form writing and SEO features.
- Brand voice controls support consistent content.
- Supports multilingual writing.
- Team collaboration is available.
- Lists 50 native integrations.
What to know first
- Starter is limited to five users.
- Starter allows three active connectors.
- Starter storage is 50 GB in a single graph.
Alternatives to prosesmasher Alternatives to WRITER The whole list