Side by side
Progress Sitefinity vs TYPO3
Both stand on web content management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial APISelf-hostedWeb+1
Choose Sitefinity if you need a CMS with deployment choice and capabilities for managing digital experiences. Consider another option if you require published pricing, a free plan, or Integration Hub without Sitefinity Cloud or Sitefinity Insight.
Visit Progress Sitefinity Free plan Web
Visit TYPO3 The facts
| Progress Sitefinity | TYPO3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Progress Sitefinity | Not published |
| Website | progress.com | typo3.org |
| On web content management software | #15 of 24 | #19 of 24 |
Progress Sitefinity: what it does well
- Manage pages, assets, and multilingual content in one interface.
- Includes SEO and digital asset management capabilities.
- Supports personalization, headless delivery, and experimentation.
- Offers a hosted 14-day trial and a local 30-day trial.
- Self-hosted LTS versions include 4+ years of support.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Pricing is on request.
- Some AI capabilities are add-ons.
- Integration Hub is limited to Sitefinity Cloud or Insight customers.
TYPO3: what it does well
Alternatives to Progress Sitefinity Alternatives to TYPO3 The whole list