Side by side
PR-Agent vs Review Assistant
Both stand on code review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hosted
PR-Agent combines pull-request review, improvement suggestions, and question answering across several git platforms. It assists human reviewers rather than replacing them, and large diffs may need configured chunking for fuller coverage.
Visit PR-Agent Free plan Self-hostedWindows
Review Assistant provides structured reviews, threaded discussions, reports, notifications, and broad repository integrations in a self-hosted package. Its free tier targets small teams, while paid licenses expand user capacity.
Visit Review AssistantThe facts
| PR-Agent | Review Assistant | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted | Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | 10 Users: $349.95, paid once |
| Plans published | 1 | 6 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | docs.pr-agent.ai | devart.com |
| On code review software | #29 of 51 | #33 of 51 |
PR-Agent: what it does well
- Free open-source software
- Reviews security concerns and tests
- Runs locally, in comments, or automatically
- Supports major Git hosting platforms
- Offers configurable review rules
What to know first
- Local use requires an LLM API key
- Local use requires a git-platform token
- Large diffs may omit whole files
- Jira Server and Data Center unsupported
Review Assistant: what it does well
- Supports simple and strict review workflows
- Threaded comments can mark defects
- Handles iterative fix-and-verification cycles
- Integrates with multiple code hosts
- Provides review and coverage reports
What to know first
- Free version is limited to three users
- Free version allows one project
- Paid licenses are one-time purchases
- Self-hosted installation is required
Alternatives to PR-Agent Alternatives to Review Assistant The whole list