FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Pound vs Reproxy

Both stand on reverse proxy software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Pound

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Pound provides focused proxying, HTTPS termination, routing, and failover for self-hosted Linux services. Its lack of response caching makes it unsuitable when caching is required.

Visit Pound

Reproxy

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

Reproxy provides routing, TLS, traffic management, and extensibility in a self-hosted package. Its active development brings current changes, so configuration may need adjustment before version 1.

Visit Reproxy

The facts

PoundReproxy
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comreproxy.io
On reverse proxy software#25 of 33#21 of 33

Pound: what it does well

  • Free Linux self-hosted deployment
  • Terminates HTTPS and supports ACME HTTP-01
  • Routes using IP, URL, or request headers
  • Stops routing to failed backends
  • Supports WebSocket connections

What to know first

  • Does not cache requests
  • Documentation says it is not a web accelerator
  • Building requires OpenSSL 1.1.x or 3.0.x
  • Configuration is file-based

Reproxy: what it does well

  • Supports Docker and Consul routing providers
  • Automatic and user-provided TLS certificates
  • Includes health checks and load balancing
  • Offers route-level access controls
  • Provides Prometheus metrics

What to know first

  • Container runs as root by default
  • Forwarded IP headers can be spoofed
  • Project may introduce breaking changes before version 1
  • Self-hosted deployment requires administration

Alternatives to Pound Alternatives to Reproxy The whole list