Side by side
Polymail vs Wan
Both stand on email clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid WebWindowsMac+1
Polymail focuses on multi-account email with scheduling and calendar features across web, desktop, and iOS. Premium expands account and calendar allowances substantially over Basic, while Enterprise lists more calendar pages.
Visit Polymail Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Choose Wan if you want an open source, self-hosted video model suite with multiple generation and editing tasks, and can meet its setup and hardware requirements. Look elsewhere if you need a hosted service or higher resolution from the T2V-1.3B model.
Visit WanThe facts
| Polymail | Wan | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web, Windows, Mac, iPhone | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Basic: $10 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Polymail | Not published |
| Website | polymail.io | github.com |
| On email clients | #120 of 142 | #116 of 142 |
Polymail: what it does well
- Unified inbox for connected accounts
- Scheduled sending
- Calendar tools
- Web, Windows, macOS, and iOS apps
- 7-day trial
What to know first
- No free plan
- Basic allows two connected accounts
- Basic includes one calendar page
Wan: what it does well
- Supports text-to-video, image-to-video, editing, text-to-image, and video-to-audio.
- Can generate Chinese and English text within videos.
- T2V-14B supports output up to 720P.
- Open source under Apache-2.0; commercial use is permitted.
- Integrates with Diffusers and ComfyUI.
What to know first
- T2V-1.3B requires 8.19 GB of VRAM.
- T2V-1.3B supports 480P; its 720P results are less stable.
- The quickstart requires PyTorch 2.4.0 or later.