FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Plux vs qmux

Both stand on terminal multiplexers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Plux

Free plan LinuxMac

Plux provides core multiplexer features with SSH attachment and optional clipboard support. Its Unix-only scope and lack of crash recovery or terminal graphics support are important constraints.

Visit Plux

qmux

Free plan Mac

qmux combines agent sessions, terminal panes, follow-up queues, and local recovery in a macOS app. It is a fit for users comfortable setting up their own agent CLIs and working within its platform limits.

Visit qmux

The facts

Pluxqmux
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, MacMac
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On terminal multiplexers#21 of 29#25 of 29

Plux: what it does well

  • Named sessions detach and reattach
  • Vertical and horizontal pane splits
  • SSH remote attachment
  • Searchable scrollback and history
  • MIT-licensed free software

What to know first

  • Windows is unsupported
  • Shells are not restored after crashes or reboot
  • Terminal graphics protocols are unsupported
  • Remote clipboard uploads default to 64 MiB

qmux: what it does well

  • Adapters for eight named coding agents
  • Queue, edit, reorder, and steer follow-ups
  • Local session metadata supports restart recovery
  • Markdown prompt library has global and project scopes
  • Free under the MIT license

What to know first

  • Requires macOS 13 Ventura or later
  • Linux desktop support is planned
  • Users install and authenticate agent CLIs themselves
  • Worktree creation and browser panel are experimental

Alternatives to Plux Alternatives to qmux The whole list