FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Pixotope vs SMODE

Both stand on virtual production software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Pixotope

Free plan APILinuxWindows

Pixotope combines real-time graphics, tracking, and broadcast video capabilities for virtual production workflows. The free Discovery plan is limited, and licenses are assigned to users rather than supported through an onsite floating server.

Visit Pixotope

SMODE

Free plan Windows

SMODE combines compositing, mapping, playback, and live control for show and installation workflows. Its free plan is limited to non-commercial use, while commercial use starts with Compose FHD at €300 a year, excluding VAT.

Visit SMODE

The facts

PixotopeSMODE
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, WindowsWindows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestSmode Compose FHD: €300 a year
Plans published36
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitepixotope.comsmode.io
On virtual production software#8 of 28#12 of 28

Pixotope: what it does well

  • Free Discovery plan with HD configuration
  • Uses Unreal Engine for real-time rendering
  • Offers markerless and marker-based tracking options
  • Supports UHD and 4K formats
  • Provides an open API and free SDK

What to know first

  • Discovery is feature-limited
  • Licenses are assigned to users
  • No onsite floating license server is currently supported

SMODE: what it does well

  • Supports real-time 2D and 3D compositing.
  • Includes video mapping and stage simulation.
  • Community plan has no watermarks.
  • Supports live protocols and people tracking.
  • Community edition lists scripting and media integrations.

What to know first

  • Windows only; requires Windows 10 version 18h3 or later.
  • Community license is non-commercial.
  • Licensing is not designed for virtual machines.
  • Live plan prices require contacting the maker.

Alternatives to Pixotope Alternatives to SMODE The whole list