Side by side
Pingbreak vs Uptime Kuma
Both stand on uptime monitoring software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Pingbreak offers unlimited one-minute checks and several alert routes at no charge for beta testers. Access requires a Twitter account and messaging permissions.
Visit Pingbreak Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWeb+1
Uptime Kuma provides broad self-hosted monitoring, alerting and status-page features under an MIT license. Check the supported operating systems and storage limitations before choosing a deployment.
Visit Uptime KumaThe facts
| Pingbreak | Uptime Kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | pingbreak.com | github.com |
| On uptime monitoring software | #19 of 48 | #18 of 48 |
Pingbreak: what it does well
- Unlimited URLs for beta testers.
- Checks run every minute.
- Offers six alert channel types.
- Free for beta testers, according to the site.
What to know first
- Open beta requires a Twitter account.
- Twitter permissions are required for messages.
- Service is described as volunteer-developed and sponsor-hosted.
Uptime Kuma: what it does well
- Monitors services, DNS, Docker containers and more.
- Supports more than 90 notification services.
- Multiple status pages can map to specific domains.
- Installation instructions cover Docker and non-Docker setups.
- Includes two-factor authentication.
What to know first
- Network file systems such as NFS are unsupported.
- FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Replit and Heroku are unsupported.
- General or technical support by email is unavailable.
Alternatives to Pingbreak Alternatives to Uptime Kuma The whole list