Side by side
Pico Corvil Analytics vs sipmon
Both stand on voip monitoring software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APISelf-hosted
Corvil Analytics focuses on passive VoIP monitoring and detailed troubleshooting from packet data. Capacity and pricing depend on the deployment, with pricing available on request.
Visit Pico Corvil Analytics Paid LinuxSelf-hosted
sipmon brings SIP correlation, media metrics, and diagnostic rules into a standalone Linux tool. On busy relay hosts, capture may need filtering or a dedicated mirrored capture box.
Visit sipmonThe facts
| Pico Corvil Analytics | sipmon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | pico.net | github.com |
| On voip monitoring software | #16 of 20 | #19 of 20 |
Pico Corvil Analytics: what it does well
- Measures RTP MOS, jitter, and packet loss across media packets.
- Passive deployment requires no agents.
- Provides access to signaling and media packets.
- Supports a range of VoIP systems.
- Centralized search can manage up to 600 appliances.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- No synthetic call testing is listed.
sipmon: what it does well
- Runs without a PBX.
- Accepts live, file, stdin, and event-log captures.
- Reports jitter, loss, delay estimates, and MOS.
- Includes more than 20 diagnostic rules.
- Does not store raw RTP payload.
What to know first
- Linux is the listed platform.
- High-rate capture can compete with rtpengine for CPU.
- Synthetic call tests are not included.
Alternatives to Pico Corvil Analytics Alternatives to sipmon The whole list