FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Pi-hole vs ufdbGuard

Both stand on internet filtering software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Pi-hole

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Pi-hole combines network-wide blocking with filtering controls, query reporting, and API access. It requires suitable hosting and network configuration, and its installation-created certificate is not trusted by browsers by default.

Visit Pi-hole

ufdbGuard

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted

ufdbGuard combines category-based URL filtering with controls for tunnels and firewall bypasses. It offers a free option and trial, while larger deployments can use priced URL database subscriptions.

Visit ufdbGuard

The facts

Pi-holeufdbGuard
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Linux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planFree or on requestSee the plans
Plans published17
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitepi-hole.neturlfilterdb.com
On internet filtering software#17 of 65#21 of 65

Pi-hole: what it does well

  • Blocks content across a network without client software
  • Supports client groups and custom domain rules
  • Provides four privacy modes and searchable query history
  • Offers a REST API with app passwords

What to know first

  • Requires a static IP address or DHCP reservation
  • Minimum requirements include 512 MB RAM and 2 GB free space
  • Web interface certificate is not trusted by browsers by default

ufdbGuard: what it does well

  • Open-source filter designed for Squid
  • Blocks sites by URL categories
  • Supports custom blocklists and safe search
  • Filtering schedules and advanced reports
  • Free plan and 60-day trial

What to know first

  • Requires Squid, Linux, or BIND environment
  • Subscriptions are billed per user
  • Paid prices exclude VAT and other taxes
  • Over-2000-user price requires a quote

Alternatives to Pi-hole Alternatives to ufdbGuard The whole list