FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

PG Monitoring vs PoWA

Both stand on database monitoring. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

PG Monitoring

Free trial Self-hostedWeb

PG Monitoring brings PostgreSQL query, health, anomaly, and security monitoring into a web service with a self-hosted component. The trial and tier limits help teams evaluate fit before choosing a paid plan.

Visit PG Monitoring

PoWA

Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWeb

PoWA provides configurable PostgreSQL monitoring and tuning features, including remote collection and hypothetical index analysis. Account for its resource overhead, the remote-password limitation, and the snapshot delay when planning a deployment.

Visit PoWA

The facts

PG MonitoringPoWA
Free planA free trialYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onSelf-hosted, WebLinux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planStarter: $59 a monthFree or on request
Plans published31
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitepgmonitoring.compowa.readthedocs.io
On database monitoring#33 of 40#11 of 40

PG Monitoring: what it does well

  • Supports PostgreSQL 13–17
  • Includes query profiling and execution plans
  • Baseline-aware anomaly detection
  • AI Copilot and optimization advisors
  • 14-day trial available

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Starter limited to five instances
  • Enterprise pricing is custom

PoWA: what it does well

  • Monitors one instance or multiple remote instances
  • Can include read-only standby servers
  • Supports hypothetical index analysis with HypoPG
  • Allows custom statistics extensions
  • Free and self-hosted

What to know first

  • Requires PostgreSQL 9.4 or newer and pg_stat_statements
  • Can add performance overhead and disk usage
  • Remote-mode saved passwords are stored in plain text
  • Queries need two snapshots to appear

Alternatives to PG Monitoring Alternatives to PoWA The whole list