Side by side
Pangea AI Guard vs Splunk Guardrails
Both stand on ai guardrail software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted
Choose Pangea AI Guard if an application needs configurable LLM threat and sensitive-data detection, with options for audit logging and deployment within a customer cloud boundary. Its request limit is 20 KiB of text, and streaming responses are not currently supported for the listed Kong plugins.
Visit Pangea AI Guard Free plan Web
Visit Splunk Guardrails The facts
| Pangea AI Guard | Splunk Guardrails | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Self-hosted | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Splunk Agent Observability: $100 a month |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | pangea.cloud | splunk.com |
| On ai guardrail software | #12 of 23 | #16 of 23 |
Pangea AI Guard: what it does well
- Detects prompt injection, PII, secrets, and other configurable categories.
- Recipes can report, block, redact, encrypt, or defang content.
- Supports APIs, five SDK languages, and three gateway integrations.
- Activity Log records service calls, inputs, outputs, detections, and context.
- Edge and Private Cloud process data within the customer’s cloud boundary.
What to know first
- Requests are limited to 20 KiB of text.
- Kong integrations do not currently support streaming responses.
Splunk Guardrails: what it does well
Alternatives to Pangea AI Guard Alternatives to Splunk Guardrails The whole list