FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Ostorlab vs SEBASTiAn

Both stand on mobile application security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Ostorlab

Free plan AndroidAPIiPhone+1

Ostorlab tests mobile and connected application assets, with cross-asset attack paths and replayable exploit evidence. The free Community plan focuses on mobile scans; paid plans specify coverage limits and AI credits.

Visit Ostorlab

SEBASTiAn

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

SEBASTiAn provides static checks and a unified JSON report for Android and iOS binaries. Users should note its analysis scope and possible manual LIEF setup with Python 3.12 or later.

Visit SEBASTiAn

The facts

OstorlabSEBASTiAn
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroid, API, iPhone, WebLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planAppSec Web/API: $299 a monthFree or on request
Plans published52
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteostorlab.cogithub.com
On mobile application security testing software#2 of 21#6 of 21

Ostorlab: what it does well

  • Tests authenticated workflows including multi-factor authentication.
  • Findings include replayable proof-of-concept exploits.
  • Community includes unlimited mobile app scans.
  • Combines static, dynamic, runtime, and behavioral analysis.

What to know first

  • AppSec Mobile covers one mobile app.
  • AppSec Web/API covers up to three targets.
  • Advanced AI actions require more credits.

SEBASTiAn: what it does well

  • Analyzes Android APK and iOS IPA files.
  • Reports vulnerabilities with remediation suggestions and locations.
  • Can run from source or its official Docker image.
  • Reports are available in English and Italian.

What to know first

  • It does not perform dynamic app analysis.
  • Python 3 and CMake are required.
  • Python 3.12 or later may require manual LIEF installation.

Alternatives to Ostorlab Alternatives to SEBASTiAn The whole list