Side by side
OpenTMI vs Squash TM
Both stand on test management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
OpenTMI brings test records, results, and device resources into one test management system, with client libraries and a pytest plugin for automation workflows. Teams should account for its Node.js and MongoDB prerequisites and the default GUI's unfinished GitHub login.
Visit OpenTMI
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Visit Squash TM The facts
| OpenTMI | Squash TM | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 5 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | squashtm.com |
| On test management software | #6 of 48 | #10 of 48 |
OpenTMI: what it does well
- Free and open source under the MIT license
- Links builds, logs, cases, and device resources
- Provides REST JSON and Socket.IO interfaces
- Includes Python, JavaScript, and pytest integrations
- Documents Docker and npm source deployment
What to know first
- Requires Node.js and MongoDB
- GitHub login is not ready in the default GUI
- Self-signed certificates are not recommended for production
Squash TM: what it does well
Alternatives to OpenTMI Alternatives to Squash TM The whole list