FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

OpenText Fortify SAST vs Perforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC)

Both stand on static analysis tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

OpenText Fortify SAST

Paid LinuxMacWeb+1

Choose OpenText Fortify SAST if your team needs static analysis across source code, bytecode, or binaries, with development workflow support and custom rules. Look elsewhere if you need published pricing or a free option.

Visit OpenText Fortify SAST

Perforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC)

Paid LinuxWebWindows

Perforce QAC lists security analysis for three languages alongside IDE, CI/CD, and custom-rule support. Its paid pricing is provided on request, so buyers will need to contact Perforce to assess cost and deployment fit.

Visit Perforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC)

The facts

OpenText Fortify SASTPerforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC)
Free planNot publishedNot published
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, Web, WindowsLinux, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteopentext.comperforce.com
On static analysis tools#31 of 37#35 of 37

OpenText Fortify SAST: what it does well

  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries.
  • Supports pull request scans.
  • Offers IDE and CI/CD integration.
  • Allows custom security rules.
  • Includes automated fixes.

What to know first

  • It is a paid product.
  • Pricing is available on request.

Perforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC): what it does well

  • Supports C, C++, and Rust
  • Includes IDE and CI/CD support
  • Custom rules are listed
  • Available for Linux, Windows, and web

What to know first

  • Pricing is available on request
  • Paid product

Alternatives to OpenText Fortify SAST Alternatives to Perforce QAC (formerly Helix QAC) The whole list