Side by side
OpenRPA vs TaskTiger
Both stand on software rpa. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Windows
Visit OpenRPA Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
Choose TaskTiger if you need a self-hosted Python queue with Redis, configurable retries, and controls for scheduling and duplicate work. Look elsewhere if you need a queue that does not require Redis or prefer a bundled admin interface.
Visit TaskTigerThe facts
| OpenRPA | TaskTiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Windows | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On software rpa | #11 of 22 | #7 of 22 |
OpenRPA: what it does well
TaskTiger: what it does well
- Runs tasks in forked subprocesses or synchronously.
- Supports fixed, linear, exponential, and custom retry intervals.
- Unique queues and task locks help control duplicate work.
- Supports scheduled, periodic, and batch queues.
- Failed tasks can be retained for retry or deletion.
What to know first
- Requires a Redis connection.
- Self-hosted deployment requires running workers.
- The Flask-Admin interface is a separate project.
Alternatives to OpenRPA Alternatives to TaskTiger The whole list