Side by side
OpenDaylight vs TeraFlowSDN
Both stand on software-defined networking software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
OpenDaylight combines programmable network control with a broad set of protocols and scaling components. Its self-hosted setup and Java requirement are important considerations for deployment.
Visit OpenDaylight Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
TeraFlowSDN offers a broad controller and API surface for smart-network work, including beyond-5G use cases. Its documented deployment requirements and experimental optical driver are important constraints to review.
Visit TeraFlowSDNThe facts
| OpenDaylight | TeraFlowSDN | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | opendaylight.org | tfs.etsi.org |
| On software-defined networking software | #5 of 26 | #9 of 26 |
OpenDaylight: what it does well
- Free and open source.
- Supports several listed network protocols.
- Includes clustering and sharded data stores.
- Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
- Offers REST APIs through YANG models.
What to know first
- Self-hosted deployment is required.
- Setup requires Java 21 or later.
- The current release is labeled Chromium-SR0.
TeraFlowSDN: what it does well
- Open-source under Apache License 2.0.
- Supports a broad set of documented network interfaces.
- Provides a northbound API with gRPC methods.
- Integrates with ETSI Open Source MANO and OpenSlice.
What to know first
- Deployment documentation assumes at least 4 cores and 8 GB RAM.
- The NetConf/OpenConfig Optical driver is experimental.
- That optical driver contains proprietary extensions.
Alternatives to OpenDaylight Alternatives to TeraFlowSDN The whole list