Side by side
OpenADE vs SeaShell
Both stand on ai coding assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan iPhoneLinuxMac+1
OpenADE centers on orchestrating coding agents rather than editing code manually. Its local workflow, engine choices, integrations, and rollback snapshots are available without a subscription, while Windows users should note the experimental build.
Visit OpenADE Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
SeaShell emphasizes controlled terminal workflows, local models, and permission-gated changes. Its plans range from a free local setup to organization features such as SSO, audit controls, air-gapped deployment, and named support.
Visit SeaShellThe facts
| OpenADE | SeaShell | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | iPhone, Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Team: $30 a month |
| Plans published | 2 | 6 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | openade.ai | seashell.sh |
| On ai coding assistants | #48 of 102 | #52 of 102 |
OpenADE: what it does well
- Plans and revises agent tasks before execution
- Supports Claude Code and OpenAI Codex
- Includes terminal, search, diff, and process tools
- Creates rollback-ready git patch snapshots
- Free, open source, and MIT licensed
What to know first
- No direct code editing inside OpenADE
- Windows build is experimental and largely untested
- Requires separate Claude Code or Codex API access
SeaShell: what it does well
- Runs locally on three desktop platforms
- Read-only planning before edits
- Supports local models and provider keys
- MCP server integrations
- Offline network restriction mode
What to know first
- Hosted providers receive provider calls
- Not SOC 2 audited
- Core support is community-based
Alternatives to OpenADE Alternatives to SeaShell The whole list