FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

ONAP vs StackStorm

Both stand on autonomous networks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

ONAP

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

ONAP combines service design, lifecycle orchestration, and runtime automation in a modular open source platform. Its full deployment requirements are substantial, though selecting components can reduce them.

Visit ONAP

StackStorm

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

StackStorm offers an event-driven automation model with integrations, execution records, access controls, and several interfaces at no cost. Its Linux support boundaries and self-hosted deployment make platform compatibility and operations important considerations.

Visit StackStorm

The facts

ONAPStackStorm
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteonap.orgstackstorm.com
On autonomous networks#1 of 17#2 of 17

ONAP: what it does well

  • Supports physical, virtual, and cloud-native network functions.
  • Runtime includes monitoring and closed-loop automation.
  • Modular components let users select orchestration functions.
  • Role-based access serves design and operations personnel.
  • Published blueprints include 5G, VoLTE, and cross-domain VPN.

What to know first

  • Full deployment guide lists 224 GB RAM and 112 vCores.
  • Full deployment guide lists 160 GB disk.
  • Known issues and limitations are documented in project release notes.
  • Product support service is not described.

StackStorm: what it does well

  • Free and open source, with no paid project products.
  • Rules connect triggers to actions or workflows.
  • Records execution context and results.
  • Provides a Web UI, CLI, REST API, and Python bindings.
  • Role-based access control is available in open source.

What to know first

  • Official support is limited to specified Linux distributions.
  • Windows and Apple OSX lack official support.
  • Requires a self-hosted deployment.

Alternatives to ONAP Alternatives to StackStorm The whole list