Side by side
olareg vs ZenoRegistry
Both stand on container registries. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxMac+2
olareg focuses on registry use in tests and edge caches, with both persistent directory storage and ephemeral memory storage. Periodic reauthentication and authentication setup for public writable deployments are considerations for operators.
Visit olareg
Paid APISelf-hostedWeb
ZenoRegistry combines OCI registry functions, enterprise identity controls, retention policies, and supply-chain metadata handling in a self-hosted package. Its runtime dependencies and contact-based pricing are important considerations for deployment planning.
Visit ZenoRegistryThe facts
| olareg | ZenoRegistry | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | olareg.org | citiumsoftware.com |
| On container registries | #49 of 60 | #53 of 60 |
olareg: what it does well
- Free and open source.
- Runs as a container, binary, or Go package.
- Supports directory and ephemeral in-memory storage.
- Repository ACLs can grant read, write, and delete access.
- Binaries and images are signed with cosign.
What to know first
- Opaque tokens expire after five minutes.
- Public writable installs should have authentication configured.
ZenoRegistry: what it does well
- OCI push, pull, and artifact operations
- OIDC single sign-on integrations
- Repository-level pull, push, and admin roles
- Retention rules with dry-run previews
- S3-compatible storage integrations
What to know first
- PostgreSQL is required at runtime
- S3-compatible object storage is required
- Pricing is available only on request
Alternatives to olareg Alternatives to ZenoRegistry The whole list