Side by side
Offensive360 MAST vs Q-mast
Both stand on mobile application security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
Visit Offensive360 MAST Paid AndroidAPIiPhone
Choose Q-mast if your development team needs mobile app security analysis across compiled builds, app behavior, and dependencies. Teams seeking a stated price will need to request pricing from Quokka.
Visit Q-mastThe facts
| Offensive360 MAST | Q-mast | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Android, API, iPhone |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | offensive360.com | quokka.io |
| On mobile application security testing software | #21 of 21 | #17 of 21 |
Offensive360 MAST: what it does well
Q-mast: what it does well
- Analyzes compiled binaries without requiring source code.
- Supports obfuscated, protected, and signed builds.
- Combines static, dynamic, interactive, and forced-path analysis.
- Generates version-specific software bills of materials.
- Lists integrations including GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and Snyk.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- The stated mobile app analysis covers iOS and Android.
Alternatives to Offensive360 MAST Alternatives to Q-mast The whole list