Side by side
Noma Security vs Operant AI
Both stand on ai agent security software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APISelf-hostedWeb
Choose Noma Security if your organization needs enterprise AI discovery, access governance, testing, and runtime protection across its AI environments. Look elsewhere if you need a public price or plan limits to assess the cost before contacting the company.
Visit Noma Security Paid LinuxMacWindows
Visit Operant AI The facts
| Noma Security | Operant AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | noma.security | operant.ai |
| On ai agent security software | #12 of 31 | #16 of 31 |
Noma Security: what it does well
- Discovers agents, MCP servers, skills, and models.
- Maps AI asset connections, permissions, and data access.
- Can block, mask data, alert, or route activity to a human.
- Red-team findings feed into runtime policies.
- Supports agent hooks, gateways, SDKs, and direct APIs.
What to know first
- The product is paid, with pricing available on request.
- Trust documents are confidential under an active agreement.
- No public Enterprise plan limits are stated.
Operant AI: what it does well
Alternatives to Noma Security Alternatives to Operant AI The whole list